For me, invoking a language model using a playground (UI) interface is the most common approach for my usage. Occasionally, it can be helpful to use the a CLI to directly pipe output into a model. For example
git diff --staged | llm "write a commit message for these changes" However, I am more often inclined to open a playground and paste the bits and pieces of context I need. Maybe, it’s that refinement and followups are common enough that using a CLI isn’t nearly as flexible.I enjoyed this article by Ken about production LLM use cases with OpenAI models.
When it comes to prompts, less is more
This resonated with me. I’ve found that too much instruction can lead a model to perform worse on a task.
GPT is really bad at producing the null hypothesis
This also seems to confirm what I’ve seen empirically, but I never ask for it. I ask for something like, “return an empty JSON array if you can’t find anything”.I enjoyed Martin’s article on preserving your shell history. I implemented some of his approaches in my system config.Gemini Pro 1.5 up and running. I’ve said this before but I will say it again – the fact that I don’t need to deal with GCP to use Google models gives me joy.
❯ llm -m gemini-1.5-pro-latest "who is the fastest man in the world?" As of November 2023, **Usain Bolt** is still considered the fastest man in the world. He holds the world record in the 100 meters with a time of 9.Today, I learned about Command-R model series from Cohere from Shawn’s great AI newsletter (ainews). I searched to see if a plugin was available for llm and Simon had literally authored one 8(!) hours earlier. Folks like you keep me inspired and motivated 🙏. No better workflow out there that I know of:
llm install llm-command-r llm -m r-plus hello Error: No key found - add one using 'llm keys set cohere' or set the COHERE_API_KEY environment variable llm keys set cohere Enter key: .A great article by Manuel about forever-growth of companies. I too wish we’d be more willing to celebrate enough.I’ve been digging more into evals. I wrote a simple Claude completion function in openai/evals to better understand how the different pieces fit together. Quick and dirty code:
from anthropic import Anthropic from evals.api import CompletionFn, CompletionResult from evals.prompt.base import is_chat_prompt class ClaudeChatCompletionResult(CompletionResult): def __init__(self, response) -> None: self.response = response def get_completions(self) -> list[str]: return [self.response.strip()] class ClaudeChatCompletionFn(CompletionFn): def __init__(self, **kwargs) -> None: self.client = Anthropic() def __call__(self, prompt, **kwargs) -> ClaudeChatCompletionResult: if is_chat_prompt(prompt): messages = prompt system_prompt = next((p for p in messages if p.I can’t believe I am saying this but if you play around with language models locally, a 1 TB drive, might not be big enough for very long.As someone learning to draw, I really enjoyed this article: https://maggieappleton.com/still-cant-draw. I’ve watched the first three videos in this playlist so far and have been sketching random objects from around the house. I find that I’m not too big of a fan of my drawing as I’m doing it but when I return to it later, I seem to like it more. Apparently, this is a common experience for creatives.I’m taking a break from sketchybar for now.
I’m currently looking into build a NL to SQL plugin or addition to datasette to use a language model to write queries.